Downfall Pt 16

Part 16

By now you probably think I am a conspiracy nut, a believer in nonexistent threats to our country. Maybe, maybe not. I would like to present you with some documented information that might cause you to join me here in conspiracy land.

First off I have already gone over our Constitution, and the importance it plays in how we are governed. President Bush took an oath of office to defend and uphold the Constitution did he not? How does he feel about the Constitution?
I would like for you to read the following verbal exchange that took place in the oval office. It took place when GOP leaders told Bush that his push to renew some provisions of the Patriot Act would alienate conservatives.

"GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate White House Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

"I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."

"Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution."

"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"

What does that tell you about someone who swore an oath to uphold the document he calls a goddamned piece of paper? The entire article covering this story can be found
here

How come we never heard anything at all about this outrage on the network news? You will find out why in a few minutes if you continue reading.

Next up is the United Nations. For one thing, the United Nations are not part of our government. We the people did not elect them to pass laws that affect our lives. Therefore under our form of government, any resolutions they pass that go against our Constitution are not legal since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, (except according to George W. Bush), and therefore non-binding.

George Washington made a statement once that I think bears great importance when considering our ties to the U.N. He said,

"It is our true policy to steer clear of any permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world."

Now I want you to read a quote by former President George Bush.

"...pledged his allegiance to the communist UN and a world government in 1992, when he said to the communist UN General Assembly: " "It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance."?

As I stated just a moment ago, we did not vote for the U.N. members so why then did former President Bush pledge our allegiance to them? Who's interests was he protecting when he said that?

So do we bother with the U.N. Let's take a look at some of the goals of the U.N. The U.N. has established 8 goals that they call the Millennium Goals. This information was taken directly off the U.N. webpage. You can go here to read it for yourself if you don't trust me.

The eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) – which range from halving extreme poverty to halting the spread of HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary education, all by the target date of 2015 – form a blueprint agreed to by all the world’s countries and all the world’s leading development institutions. They have galvanized unprecedented efforts to meet the needs of the world’s poorest.

The goals are as follows,
1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
2. Achieve universal primary education
3. Promote gender equality and empower women
4. Reduce child mortality
5. Improve maternal health
6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
7. Ensure environmental sustainability
8. Develop a global partnership for development
This is what Kofi Annan said about these goals.

"We will have time to reach the Millennium Development Goals – worldwide and in most, or even all, individual countries – but only if we break with business as usual.
We cannot win overnight. Success will require sustained action across the entire decade between now and the deadline. It takes time to train the teachers, nurses and engineers; to build the roads, schools and hospitals; to grow the small and large businesses able to create the jobs and income needed. So we must start now. And we must more than double global development assistance over the next few years. Nothing less will help to achieve
the Goals."
United Nations Secretary-General
Kofi A. Annan

They all sound good on the surface, I mean who doesn't want to eradicate diseases like AIDS, or eradicate poverty and hunger? It is numbers 7 and 8 that have me worried though.

On the information page for number 7 it states, "Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes; reverse loss of environmental resources "

What exactly is sustainable development? The U.N. calls their plan for sustainable development Agenda 21 The following is the goal of Agenda 21, the United Nations Division for Sustainable Development.

"Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment."

You can read more about this plan here

Our country and its resources are ours to govern. We do not need the U.N. to rule over and tell us how to manage it.
Next is item 8, developing a global partnership for development. How do they plan to do that? Here are two of their recommendations.
Develop further an open trading and financial system that is rule-based, predictable and non-discriminatory, includes a commitment to good governance, development and poverty reduction— nationally and internationally

Address the least developed countries' special needs. This includes tariff- and quota-free access for their exports; enhanced debt relief for heavily indebted poor countries; cancellation of official bilateral debt; and more generous official development assistance for countries committed to poverty reduction

Pay particular attention to the second paragraph. They suggest tariff and quota free access for the export of poorer countries. They recommend debt relief for poorer countries and more generous development assistance. We already donate a large amount of money in foreign aid. The following numbers are how much, in millions, we donated since 2002.

2002........... 12,900
2003............15,791
2004............19,705
2005............27,457

That is a lot of money, yet the U.N. wants us to contribute more, while at the same time cancel all their debts to us. These are all poor countries, many of which have very high anti American sentiments. If they would change their opinion of us I might begin showing some sympathy towards them. However, as long as they harbor anti American sentiments they can go to Russia or France for assistance. We have enough poor and illegal immigrants to support. You don't see us with our hands out to the world asking for financial aid.

So in my opinion, the U.N. is doing nothing to help the people of this country. Therefore I recommend that you contact your elected officials to urge them to severe our ties with this organization and kick them off U.S. soil.

Next up is the Presidents favorite phrase, compassionate conservative.
This quote was taken directly from the Communitarian webpage, which can be found
at .http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/communitarian_update_n36.html

George W. Bush ran as a "compassionate conservative"; Bill Clinton was a "New Democrat." Both accept government as an important sponsor of social welfare benefits. Both also target benefit programs to avoid ever larger government and higher taxes; seek to minimize incentives that might discourage work, marriage, and self-reliance; and try to promote personal choice in the selection of service providers. Does this signal a new middle consensus for domestic policy making?

The Communitarians have a belief that individual freedoms have weakened the bonds of community and that the rights of the individual must be balanced against the rights of society as a whole.
The following is a brief overview of Communitarian philosophy,

"The communitarian solution is the ultimate synthesis in the 1812 Hegelian dialectic.[1] Hegel posed that conflicts between opposites naturally leads mankind into embracing a form of philosophical, fascist perfection. The 1848 Communist Manifesto expanded the Hegelian philosophy into dialectical materialism. The Marxist's natural conflict between the haves and the have-nots justifies riots and assassinations. It was modified in 1884 to include covert, seditious activities. This is the Marxist's "ends justify the means" theory. Hegels' and Marx's ideas were the theoretical basis for Stalin's Soviet-Russian police state and Hitler's National Socialism; both practiced eugenics against "lesser peoples."

So if the President follows this philosophy we could be on the road to a Fascist state in this country. Are you alarmed yet? Read on.

Next on my list of topics is the CFR. What is the CFR? The CFR is the Counsel on Foreign Relations. The CFR has a goal for the future of the United States. They want to merge the U.S, Canada and Mexico into a North American Union run by a common government. Their goal would obliterate all rights we as Americans have under the Constitution.

The Council on Foreign Relations report outlining their plan cannot be copied in whole or in part due to copyright laws but you can read it here:

There is a very good article covering it
here:

You may have heard the term New World Order. That is the goal of the CFR. The following quote might alarm you when you think about their plans for a New World Order.
"In Defense of the World Order ... U.S. Soldiers would have to kill and die"
– Aurthur Schlesinger Jr., July / August '95 Foreign Affairs, CFR's flagship publication"

Former Congressman John R. Rarick warned about the CFR:


The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education and mass communication media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation's right to know machinery – the news media – usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities.

The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high-level decisions for converting the United States from a sovereign constitutional republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship.

Who are some of the past and present members of this anti-American operation? Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Porter Goss, Alan Greenspan, John Bolton, Paul Wolfowitz, Gen. Richard B. Myers, Henry Hyde, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, George Bush Sr., Sandra Day O'Connor, George Soros, Christopher Dodd, Diane Feinstein, Gerald Ford, Bill Frist, Newt Gingrich, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Katherine Harris, Teresa Heinz, Antonia Hernandez – President of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Gen. John P. Jumper – current Air Force chief of staff, Joseph Lieberman, John McCain, Rupert Murdock, David Rockefeller, Diane Sawyer and Tony Snow.
If you want to find out how long these people have influence politics in this country I suggest you go here and look at the lists.
You might wonder why the news never talks about this organization and it's purpose. Here is a list of members of the news media who are members of the CFR.
Television
ABC NBC CBS
Barbara Walters Brian Williams Katie Couric
Diane Sawyer Andrea Mitchell Dan Rather
Lynn Sherr Tom Brokaw Lesley Stahl

CNN FOX PBS
Paula Zahn Tony Snow Jim Lehrer
Garrick Utley Morton Kondracke Margaret G. Warner

Newspapers

New York Times
Ethan Bronner – deputy foreign editor
Barbara Crossette – former UN bureau chief
Bernard Gwertzman – foreign affairs
Joseph Lelyveld – former executive editor
David E. Sanger – White House correspondent

Washington Post
Anne E. Applebaum – columnist
Pamela Constable – deputy foreign editor; former Kabul Bureau Chief
Karen J. DeYoung – associate editor
George F. Will – columnist
Robin Wright – correspondent

Wall Street Journal
Marcus Brauchli – global news editor
John C. Bussey – deputy managing editor
Daniel Henninger – deputy editor of the editorial page
Carol Giacomo – diplomatic correspondent for Reuters News Agency
Pranay Gupte – business columnist for The New York Sun

Magazines
Newsweek
Jonathan Alter – senior editor and columnist
Christopher S. Dickey – Paris bureau chief
Nisid Hajari – managing editor of Newsweek International
Michael Hirsh – senior editor
Marcus Mabry – a senior editor
Jane Bryant Quinn – contributing editor
Fareed Zakaria - Newsweek International and ABC
Time, Inc.
Hedley Donovan – former editor-in-chief
Joel Dreyfuss – senior editor of Fortune magazine
Marguerite Michaels – Midwest bureau chief
Norman Pearlstine – current editor-in-chief
Others
Jodie T. Allen – managing editor of U.S. News & World Report
William L. Allen – former editor-in-chief for National Geographic
David A. Andelman – Executive Editor of Forbes.com
William F. Buckley, Jr. - National Review
Andrew L. Shapiro – The Nation magazine
R. Emmett Tyrrell - American Spectator
Katrina vanden Heuvel – editor of The Nation
Mortimer Zuckerman, Editor-in-Chief of U.S. News & World Report

Board of Directors of the Corporate Media
Walt Disney (Disney, ABC, ESPN)
(Sen.) George J. Mitchell, Chairman of the Board
John E. Bryson
John S. Chen
Monica C. Lozano
Viacom
Ellen V. Futter
Frederic V. Salerno
News Corporation (Fox News)
Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and CEO
*Viet Dinh
John L. Thornton
Time Warner (CNN, Time, Warner Brothers, etc.)
Richard D. Parsons, Chairman and CEO
Jessica P. Einhorn
Frank J. Caufield
Carla A. Hills
CBS (Viacom and CBS separated in Jan. 2006)
Joseph A. Califano, Jr.
William S. “Bill” Cohen
New York Times Co. (New York Times, Boston Globe)
Henry B. Schacht
Donald M. Stewart
Gannett Co. (USA Today)
*Louis D. Boccardi
James A. Johnson
Donna Shalala

So now you see that the news media does not want you to know about the CFR because for the most part they are all members of it. Makes you wonder how truthful our news really is, doesn't it? The news media is not going to spill the secrets concerning an organization which a good portion of them belong to. They also would not be ready to broadcast stories that might alert the public to what their intentions are. So we are being deprived of news that we have a right to know about. That is why earlier I asked if you researched for information on your own. You surely aren't getting the whole truth from the news media, and therefore it is up to you to seek it out.


Next I would like to address the Trilateral Commission, another group you probably have never heard of. Read what Barry Goldwater had to say about them,

The Trilateral Commission is another little known entity that is diligently and methodically working to destroy the sovereignty of this nation and put the United States under foreign rule – it is the twin monster of the CFR. Barry Goldwater was one of the lone voices decades ago trying to warn the American people about this operation. He said of the Trilateral Commission:

The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical.



If you want to learn more about the Trilateral Commission you can do so at:
here:

If you want to know who are members of this anti-American group you can look here:



So that is a brief overview of some of the inside goings on of this country. Have I shown you anything that might make you interested in learning more? If so my last segment will be full of links for articles you can read for more information. In the meantime I would like to tell you a story. This was told to me by a co-worker the other day while we were discussing politics.

He said that at one time he worked for some walnut farmers and they were attending a union meeting which had as a guest a U.S. Congressman. He would not give me the name but he said the Congressman gave a speech about how they support the framers, blah, blah blah. After the meeting my co-worker walked up to the Congressman and asked him bluntly who is running the show in this country. The Congressman asked what he meant. My co worker said who is running our country, is it the President or is it the CFR or Tri lateral Commission. My co worker said at that instant the Congressmans eyes literally bulged and he stood there a moment speechless. Then he slowly shook his head to the affirmative and said that no one would believe my co worker if he told anyone. They would think him a conspiracy nut or something.

So, if you think it is still all conspiracy theory material, then I guess there is nothing else I can do to convince you. I have a friend who recently told me he does not buy into the gloom and doom theories. I respect him still but am saddened by the fact he is not willing to look at the facts with an open mind. I have done about all I can do to convince you. It is up to you to take the first step and research the information I have given you further. You can then decide for yourself if I am worth listening to or a nut.

I would like to leave you with one final quote by Thomas Jefferson and then I am done. He said,

“The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all?

That concludes my attempt to inform you of things going on and to do away with your apathy and lack of concern. Hopefully something I have said will have made you sit back and say ‘What the hell?” If so my time will have been well spent.